From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Nomac Drilling, LLC v. USEDC OKC, LLC

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA
Nov 3, 2015
Case No. CIV-14-0155-C (W.D. Okla. Nov. 3, 2015)

Opinion

Case No. CIV-14-0155-C

11-03-2015

NOMAC DRILLING, LLC, et al., Plaintiff, v. USEDC OKC, LLC, et al., Defendants.


MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

Before the Court is Non-party Halliburton Energy Services, Inc.'s Objection and Motion to Quash or Modify Subpoena Duces Tecum (Dkt. No. 106). The third-party Defendant, Grace Consulting Services, Inc., has not filed a response. The Motion to Quash is granted because the information requested in the subpoena is overbroad.

Accordingly, the Court GRANTS Non-party Halliburton Energy Services, Inc.'s Objection and Motion to Quash or Modify Subpoena Duces Tecum (Dkt. No. 106).

IT IS SO ORDERED on this 3rd day of November, 2015.

/s/_________

ROBIN J. CAUTHRON

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Nomac Drilling, LLC v. USEDC OKC, LLC

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA
Nov 3, 2015
Case No. CIV-14-0155-C (W.D. Okla. Nov. 3, 2015)
Case details for

Nomac Drilling, LLC v. USEDC OKC, LLC

Case Details

Full title:NOMAC DRILLING, LLC, et al., Plaintiff, v. USEDC OKC, LLC, et al.…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA

Date published: Nov 3, 2015

Citations

Case No. CIV-14-0155-C (W.D. Okla. Nov. 3, 2015)