From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Nolan v. Thompson

United States District Court, W.D. Missouri, Central Division
Jan 16, 2007
No. 05-4237-CV-C-SOW (W.D. Mo. Jan. 16, 2007)

Opinion

No. 05-4237-CV-C-SOW.

January 16, 2007


ORDER


On November 9, 2006, the United States Magistrate Judge recommended dismissing plaintiff's claims. The parties were advised they could file written exceptions to the recommendation, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C).

The court has conducted a de novo review of the record, including the exceptions filed by plaintiff on November 29, 2006. The issues raised in plaintiff's exceptions were adequately addressed in the report and recommendation. The court is persuaded that the recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is correct and should be adopted.

Inmates who file an appeal with the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit are required to pay the full $455.00 appellate filing fee, regardless of the outcome of the appeal. Henderson v. Norris, 129 F.3d 481, 484 (8th Cir. 1997). The filing of a notice of appeal is considered a consent by the inmate to allow prison officials to deduct an initial partial appellate filing fee and later installments from the prisoner's account.

IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that the Magistrate Judge's November 9, 2006 Report and Recommendation is adopted [43]. It is further

ORDERED that plaintiff's motion for summary judgment is denied, defendants' motion for summary judgment is granted and plaintiff's claims are dismissed [30, 37].


Summaries of

Nolan v. Thompson

United States District Court, W.D. Missouri, Central Division
Jan 16, 2007
No. 05-4237-CV-C-SOW (W.D. Mo. Jan. 16, 2007)
Case details for

Nolan v. Thompson

Case Details

Full title:ROGER R. NOLAN, Register No. 46531, Plaintiff, v. DANA D. THOMPSON, et…

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Missouri, Central Division

Date published: Jan 16, 2007

Citations

No. 05-4237-CV-C-SOW (W.D. Mo. Jan. 16, 2007)

Citing Cases

Williams v. Crawford

Given the statutory language, inmates were said to have had a liberty interest in parole. See, e.g., Nolan v.…

Robles v. Dennison

However, contrary to the state's assertion, that decision does not permanently bind the state's discretion.…