From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Nolan v. Rhodes

U.S.
Jun 22, 1964
378 U.S. 556 (1964)

Opinion

APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO.

No. 454.

Decided June 22, 1964.

Together with No. 455, Sive et al. v. Ellis et al., also on appeal from the same court.

Judgment reversed and cases remanded.

Reported below: 218 F. Supp. 953.

Kenneth G. Weinberg and Stewart R. Jaffy for appellant in No. 454.

William B. Saxbe, Attorney General of Ohio, and Hugh A. Sherer for appellees in No. 454.

Jerome Goldman, Robert P. Goldman and Harris Weston for appellants in No. 455.

William B. Saxbe, Attorney General of Ohio, Gerald A. Donahue, First Assistant Attorney General, and John J. Chester for appellees in No. 455.



The judgment below is reversed. Reynolds v. Sims, 377 U.S. 533. The cases are remanded for further proceedings consistent with the views stated in our opinions in Reynolds v. Sims and in the other cases relating to state legislative apportionment decided along with Reynolds.

MR. JUSTICE CLARK would reverse on the grounds stated in his opinion in Reynolds v. Sims, 377 U.S. 533, 587.

MR. JUSTICE STEWART would affirm the judgment because the Ohio system of legislative apportionment is clearly a rational one and clearly does not frustrate effective majority rule.

MR. JUSTICE HARLAN dissents for the reasons stated in his dissenting opinion in Reynolds v. Sims, 377 U.S. 533, 589.


Summaries of

Nolan v. Rhodes

U.S.
Jun 22, 1964
378 U.S. 556 (1964)
Case details for

Nolan v. Rhodes

Case Details

Full title:NOLAN v . RHODES, GOVERNOR OF OHIO, ET AL

Court:U.S.

Date published: Jun 22, 1964

Citations

378 U.S. 556 (1964)

Citing Cases

Wilson v. Kasich

State ex rel. King v. Rhodes, 11 Ohio St.2d 95, 99, 228 N.E.2d 653 (1967). {¶ 71} Respondents claim that the…

State, ex rel King, v. Rhodes

" The United States District Court noted that the reason for the submission of these suggested plans was that…