From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Nolan v. Palmer

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Sep 28, 2012
CASE NUMBER: 3:09-CV-0188-RCJ-WGC (D. Nev. Sep. 28, 2012)

Opinion

CASE NUMBER: 3:09-CV-0188-RCJ-WGC

09-28-2012

RICKY NOLAN, Petitioner, v. JACK PALMER, et al., Respondents.


JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL CASE

_ Jury Verdict. This action came before the Court for a trial by jury. The issues have been tried and the jury has rendered its verdict. _ Decision by Court. This action came to trial or hearing before the Court. The issues have been tried or heard and a decision has been rendered. × Decision by Court. This action came to be considered before the Court. The issues have been considered and a decision has been rendered.

IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the amended petition for a writ of habeas corpus (ECF No. 14) is DENIED IN ITS ENTIRETY.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that petitioner is GRANTED A CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY on the following issues:

(1) Whether the trial court's admission of Weishaar's posthypnotic testimony was constitutional error;
(2) If the trial court's admission of Weishaar's posthypnotic testimony was constitutional error, whether the error was harmless; and
(3) Whether petitioner's convictions for sexual assault and first-degree kidnapping from the Weishaar Trial are supported by sufficient evidence.

LANCE S. WILSON

Clerk

Jennifer Cotter

Deputy Clerk


Summaries of

Nolan v. Palmer

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Sep 28, 2012
CASE NUMBER: 3:09-CV-0188-RCJ-WGC (D. Nev. Sep. 28, 2012)
Case details for

Nolan v. Palmer

Case Details

Full title:RICKY NOLAN, Petitioner, v. JACK PALMER, et al., Respondents.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA

Date published: Sep 28, 2012

Citations

CASE NUMBER: 3:09-CV-0188-RCJ-WGC (D. Nev. Sep. 28, 2012)