From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Nolan v. Palmer

United States District Court, D. Nevada
Dec 10, 2010
3: 09-cv-0188-RCJ-RAM (D. Nev. Dec. 10, 2010)

Opinion

3: 09-cv-0188-RCJ-RAM.

December 10, 2010


ORDER


This is a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 in which petitioner, a state prisoner, is proceeding pro se. On December 6, 2010, petitioner filed a motion for appointment of counsel for investigative purposes. (Docket #66.) Petitioner's motion is DENIED for the reasons previously stated in this court's orders of January 27, 2010, and September 20, 2010.

On December 6, 2010, petitioner filed a motion for "recusal" of Deputy Attorney General Dennis Wilson. (Docket #67.) This motion is DENIED as without legal basis.

On December 8, 2010, petitioner filed a motion entitled, "Extension of Time/Denial of Right to Respond by District court Failure to Serve Petitioner In a Timely Fashion by Attorney Office." (Docket #68.) In this document, petitioner apparently seeks an extension of time to file his reply to respondents' answer filed November 19, 2010. Petitioner's motion is GRANTED and petitioner is granted to and including January 15, 2011, to file his reply.

DATED this 10th day of December, 2010.


Summaries of

Nolan v. Palmer

United States District Court, D. Nevada
Dec 10, 2010
3: 09-cv-0188-RCJ-RAM (D. Nev. Dec. 10, 2010)
Case details for

Nolan v. Palmer

Case Details

Full title:RICKY NOLAN, Petitioner, v. JACK PALMER, et al., Respondents

Court:United States District Court, D. Nevada

Date published: Dec 10, 2010

Citations

3: 09-cv-0188-RCJ-RAM (D. Nev. Dec. 10, 2010)