From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Noguchi v. Astrue

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Aug 10, 2011
Civil Action No.: 11-cv-01228-AP (D. Colo. Aug. 10, 2011)

Opinion

Civil Action No.: 11-cv-01228-AP

08-10-2011

SCOTT NOGUCHI, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant.

For Plaintiff: ANN J. ATKINSON Attorney at Law For Defendant: JOHN F. WALSH United States Attorney KEVIN TRASKOS Deputy Chief, Civil Division Assistant United States Attorney WILLIAM G. PHARO Assistant United States Attorney ALEXESS D. REA Special Assistant United States Attorney Social Security Administration Office of the General Counsel


JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR SOCIAL SECURITY CASES

1. APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE PARTIES:

For Plaintiff:

ANN J. ATKINSON

Attorney at Law

For Defendant:

JOHN F. WALSH

United States Attorney

KEVIN TRASKOS

Deputy Chief, Civil Division

Assistant United States Attorney

WILLIAM G. PHARO

Assistant United States Attorney

ALEXESS D. REA

Special Assistant United States Attorney

Social Security Administration

Office of the General Counsel

2. STATEMENT OF LEGAL BASIS FOR SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION

The Court has jurisdiction based on section 205(g) of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. 405(g).

3. DATES OF FILING OF RELEVANT PLEADINGS

A. Date Complaint was filed: May 6, 2011

B. Date Complaint was served on U.S. Attorney's office: May 16, 2011.

C. Date Answer and Administrative Record were filed: July 8, 2011.

4. STATEMENT REGARDING THE ADEQUACY OF THE RECORD:

The Administrative Record appears to be complete.

5. STATEMENT REGARDING ADDITIONAL EVIDENCE

The parties do not anticipate submitting additional evidence.

6. STATEMENT REGARDING WHETHER THIS CASE RAISES UNUSUAL CLAIMS OR DEFENSES.

There are no unusual claims or defenses in this case.

7. OTHER MATTERS

There are no other matters to bring to the Court's attention.

8. BRIEFING SCHEDULE

A. Plaintiff's Opening Brief Due: August 29, 2011

B. Defendant's Response Brief Due: September 30, 2011

C. Plaintiff's Reply Brief (If Any) Due: October 14, 2011

9. STATEMENTS REGARDING ORAL ARGUMENT

A. Plaintiff's statement:

Plaintiff does not request oral argument.

B. Defendant's statement

Defendant does not request oral argument.

10. CONSENT TO EXERCISE OF JURISDICTION BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE

A. () All parties have consented to the exercise of jurisdiction by a United States Magistrate Judge.

B. (X) All parties have NOT consented to the exercise of jurisdiction of a United States Magistrate Judge.

11. OTHER MATTERS

THE PARTIES FILING MOTIONS FOR EXTENSION OF TIME OR CONTINUANCES MUST COMPLY WITH D.C.COLO.LCivR 7.1(C) BY SUBMITTING PROOF THAT A COPY OF THE MOTION HAS BEEN SERVED UPON THE MOVING ATTORNEY'S CLIENT, ALL ATTORNEY'S OF RECORD, AND ALL PRO SEPARTIES.

12. AMENDMENTS TO JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN

The parties agree that the Joint Case Management Plan may be altered or amended only upon a showing of good cause.

APPROVED:

Ann J. Atkinson, Attorney at Law

BY THE COURT

John L. Kane

U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

UNITED STATES ATTORNEY

By: Alexess Rea, Esq.

Special Assistant U.S. Attorney


Summaries of

Noguchi v. Astrue

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Aug 10, 2011
Civil Action No.: 11-cv-01228-AP (D. Colo. Aug. 10, 2011)
Case details for

Noguchi v. Astrue

Case Details

Full title:SCOTT NOGUCHI, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Date published: Aug 10, 2011

Citations

Civil Action No.: 11-cv-01228-AP (D. Colo. Aug. 10, 2011)