From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Noghrey v. Acampora

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jul 17, 1989
152 A.D.2d 660 (N.Y. App. Div. 1989)

Summary

upholding facial validity of similar moratorium enacted by the Town of Brookhaven, NY

Summary of this case from Somers Realty Corp. v. Harding

Opinion

July 17, 1989

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Lama, J.).


Ordered that the appeal from the order entered February 10, 1988 is dismissed, as that order was superseded by the order dated June 6, 1988, made upon reargument; and it is further,

Ordered that the order dated June 6, 1988 is affirmed insofar as appealed from; and it is further,

Ordered that the respondents are awarded one bill of costs.

Pursuant to Local Laws, 1987, No. 2 of the Town of Brookhaven, the town placed a moratorium for six months on certain development within the town while its master plan was being updated. In our view, this moratorium "was a reasonable measure designed to temporarily halt development while the town considered comprehensive zoning changes and was therefore a valid stopgap or interim zoning measure" (Matter of Dune Assocs. v Anderson, 119 A.D.2d 574, 575; see also, Matter of Charles v Diamond, 41 N.Y.2d 318; Matter of Lakeview Apts. v Town of Stanford, 108 A.D.2d 914). Furthermore, contrary to the plaintiff's argument, the record contains no "special facts" which would except this case from the general rule that a case must be decided on the law as it exists at the time of the decision (Matter of Mascony Transp. Ferry Serv. v Richmond, 71 A.D.2d 896, affd 49 N.Y.2d 969; Matter of West Lane Props. v Lombardi, 139 A.D.2d 748).

We have reviewed the plaintiff's remaining arguments and find them to be without merit (Matter of West Lane Props. v Lombardi, supra; Tilles Inv. Co. v Town of Huntington, 137 A.D.2d 118, 122, lv granted 73 N.Y.2d 709; First Lutheran Church v Los Angeles County, 482 U.S. 304; cf., Turnpike Woods v Town of Stony Point, 70 N.Y.2d 735).

We note that since this is a declaratory judgment action, the judgment, when entered, should contain a declaration that Local Laws, 1987, No. 2 of the Town of Brookhaven is constitutional (see, Lanza v Wagner, 11 N.Y.2d 317, 334, appeal dismissed 371 U.S. 74, cert denied 371 U.S. 901). Mangano, J.P., Brown, Lawrence and Eiber, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Noghrey v. Acampora

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jul 17, 1989
152 A.D.2d 660 (N.Y. App. Div. 1989)

upholding facial validity of similar moratorium enacted by the Town of Brookhaven, NY

Summary of this case from Somers Realty Corp. v. Harding
Case details for

Noghrey v. Acampora

Case Details

Full title:PARVIS NOGHREY, Appellant, v. HENRIETTA ACAMPORA et al., Constituting the…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jul 17, 1989

Citations

152 A.D.2d 660 (N.Y. App. Div. 1989)
543 N.Y.S.2d 530

Citing Cases

Somers Realty Corp. v. Harding

Even though the injunction requested would seemingly pose little hardship to the Town Board or its members,…

Orange Lake Associates v. Kirkpatrick

The court held that the moratorium was a reasonable measure designed to temporarily halt development while…