From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Noe v. McFadden

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Aug 11, 2008
286 F. App'x 48 (4th Cir. 2008)

Opinion

No. 08-6639.

Submitted: July 31, 2008.

Decided: August 11, 2008.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Dever III, District Judge. (5:06-ct-03139-D).

Paul H. Noe, Appellant Pro Se.

Before NIEMEYER, TRAXLER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


Paul H. Noe seeks to appeal the district court's order dismissing some, but not all, of his claims raised in his complaint filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388, 91 S.Ct. 1999, 29 L.Ed.2d 619 (1971). This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2000), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2000); Fed.R.Civ.P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 69 S.Ct. 1221, 93 L.Ed. 1528 (1949). The order Noe seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.


Summaries of

Noe v. McFadden

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Aug 11, 2008
286 F. App'x 48 (4th Cir. 2008)
Case details for

Noe v. McFadden

Case Details

Full title:Paul H. NOE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. R.L. McFADDEN; Patricia R…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

Date published: Aug 11, 2008

Citations

286 F. App'x 48 (4th Cir. 2008)