From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Nodland v. Murphy

United States District Court, D. Colorado
Oct 3, 2011
Civil Action No. 11-cv-02258-WYD-MEH (D. Colo. Oct. 3, 2011)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 11-cv-02258-WYD-MEH.

October 3, 2011


ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION BY AND BETWEEN PLAINTIFF AND DEFENDANT INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA


THIS MATTER comes before the Court on the Stipulation By and Between Plaintiffs and Defendant Internal Revenue Service of the United States of America (ECF No. 14), filed September 29, 2011. After carefully reviewing the above-captioned case and being fully advised in the premises, I find that the stipulation should be approved.

Accordingly, it is

ORDERED as follows:

1. The property, which is the subject of this action, is described in the First Amended Complaint (Doc. 2) as:

LOT 28, AMENDED PLAT OF RIVER ESTATES SUBDIVISION FILING NO. 1, ARE-SUBDIVISION OF UNCOMPAHGRE PARK SUBDIVISION, FILING NO. 1, AS SHOWN BY PLAT RECORDED APRIL 1, 1986 IN PLAT BOOK 12 AT PAGE 626, COUNTY OF MONTROSE, STATE OF COLORADO

which currently has the address of 67990 Tulare Road, Montrose, CO 81403 (the "Property").

2. The United States claims an interest in the Property based on a Notice of Federal Tax Lien filed with the Montrose County Clerk and Recorder, IRS Serial No. 240675505, recorded August 9, 2005, at Reception No. 741877 (the "United States' Lien").

3. The United States' Lien is for income taxes owed by the Plaintiffs. The IRS claims the balance due on the United States' Lien is $99,361.03, computed to November 1, 2011.

4. Plaintiffs have a tax obligation and the United States' Lien is contingent of ownership in the Property.

5. The Plaintiffs' tax obligation is not conditioned on the Plaintiffs' ownership of the Property, and the tax obligation remains until paid.

6. The Parties stipulate that there are no further obligations by the United States to participate in this litigation, unless otherwise specified by the Court.

7. Each party shall bear its own attorney's fees and costs of litigation with respect to this Stipulation.


Summaries of

Nodland v. Murphy

United States District Court, D. Colorado
Oct 3, 2011
Civil Action No. 11-cv-02258-WYD-MEH (D. Colo. Oct. 3, 2011)
Case details for

Nodland v. Murphy

Case Details

Full title:PAMELA D. NODLAND and CHRISTIAN S. NODLAND, Plaintiffs, v. ROSEMARY M…

Court:United States District Court, D. Colorado

Date published: Oct 3, 2011

Citations

Civil Action No. 11-cv-02258-WYD-MEH (D. Colo. Oct. 3, 2011)