From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Noce v. Noce

Supreme Court of New Mexico
Aug 19, 1930
291 P. 293 (N.M. 1930)

Opinion

No. 3230.

August 19, 1930.

Appeal from District Court, McKinley County; Holloman, Judge.

E.A. Martin, of Gallup, for plaintiff in error.

H.C. Denny, of Gallup, for defendants in error.


OPINION OF THE COURT


As pointed out when this cause was before us on a motion to dismiss the writ of error, it is now moot. Noce v. Noce, 34 N.M. 335, 281 P. 460. We overruled the motion because of a possible liability of the plaintiff in error upon the injunction bond.

On consideration of the briefs upon the merits, and bearing in mind that no such claim of liability may ever be made, we conclude that it would not be advisable for this court to spend the time necessary to determine the various claims of error.

The judgment will be affirmed without prejudice to any further proceedings involving liability upon the injunction bond. The cause will be remanded. It is so ordered.

PARKER and CATRON, JJ., concur.

BICKLEY, C.J., and SIMMS, J., did not participate.


Summaries of

Noce v. Noce

Supreme Court of New Mexico
Aug 19, 1930
291 P. 293 (N.M. 1930)
Case details for

Noce v. Noce

Case Details

Full title:NOCE v. NOCE et al

Court:Supreme Court of New Mexico

Date published: Aug 19, 1930

Citations

291 P. 293 (N.M. 1930)
291 P. 293

Citing Cases

State v. Vogel

It is suggested by counsel that unless we entertain the appeal the judgment will operate under the doctrine…