Summary
holding that the issuance of a writ of mandamus would be a vain and useless act, despite the fact that the circuit court erred in sua sponte dismissing the appeal, because the notice of appeal was untimely
Summary of this case from Noble v. StateOpinion
CR 96-1107
Opinion delivered October 28, 1996
1. APPEAL ERROR — TRIAL COURT CANNOT PASS ON VALIDITY OF NOTICE OF APPEAL AND DISMISS IT sua sponte . — It is not within the authority of a trial court to pass on the validity of a notice of appeal and dismiss it sua sponte; at the least, a partial record suitable for tender to the appellate court should be prepared whereby the appellant may tender the record, which would allow the appellate court to determine whether the appeal should be lodged. 2. APPEAL ERROR — WRIT OF MANDAMUS DECLINED — LAW DOES NOT REQUIRE VAIN AND USELESS ACT. — Although the circuit judge erred in dismissing petitioner's appeal, the supreme court declined to issue a writ of mandamus because, under Ark. R. App. P. 4(a), the notice of appeal was untimely, and it would be a vain and useless act to mandamus the circuit judge to reinstate the notice of appeal and then dismiss the appeal in the appellate court; the law does not require a vain and useless act.
Petition for Writ of Mandamus; declined.
Lewellen Associates, by: R.C. Lewellen, for petitioner.
Winston Bryant, Att'y Gen., by: Brad Newman, Asst. Att'y Gen., for respondent.
Petitioner, Sherman Noble, has petitioned this court to issue a writ of mandamus to the Honorable Fred Davis, III, Circuit Judge, and to Jeanette Hence, Circuit Clerk. We decline to issue the writ.
The partial record shows that on May 21, 1996, the circuit court entered an order adverse to petitioner. Thirty-one days later, on June 21, 1996, petitioner filed a notice of appeal and designation of record. On June 26, 1996, the circuit judge dismissed the notice of appeal, and the circuit clerk refuses to tender a record to this court.
[1, 2] The circuit judge was in error in dismissing the appeal. It is not within the authority of a trial court to pass on the validity of a notice of appeal and dismiss it sua sponte. Barnes v. State, 322 Ark. 814, 912 S.W.2d 405 (1995). At the least, a partial record suitable for tender to the appellate court should be prepared whereby the appellant may tender the record, which would allow the appellate court to determine whether the appeal should be lodged. Barnes, 322 Ark. at 815, 912 S.W.2d at 406. However, even though the circuit judge erred, we decline to issue a writ of mandamus. The notice of appeal was untimely, see Ark. R. App. P. 4(a), and it would be a vain and useless act to mandamus the circuit judge to reinstate the notice of appeal and then dismiss the appeal in this court. The law does not require a vain and useless act. Jacobs v. State, 321 Ark. 561, 906 S.W.2d 670 (1995).
Writ declined.