From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Noble v. Cleland

Supreme Court of California
Feb 19, 1909
100 P. 254 (Cal. 1909)

Opinion

         Department 1.

         Appeal from Superior Court, Mendocino County; J. Q. White, Judge.

          J. W. Preston, for appellant.

          Arthur J. Thatcher, for respondent.


          PER CURIUM.

         This is an action by a taxpayer to enjoin payment of a city warrant issued in payment of the monthly salary of one B. H. Miller as ‘ executive officer’ of said city of Ukiah. The office in question was created by an ordinance of the board of trustees of the city. Plaintiff claims that the board had no power to pass the ordinance creating the office, and hence that it is void. The court below held the ordinance valid, and gave judgment for the defendant. In the case of De Merritt v. Weldon (decided November 20, 1908) 98 P. 537, this court, in bank, considered this question, and declared the ordinance valid.

         Upon the authority of that case, the judgment is affirmed.


Summaries of

Noble v. Cleland

Supreme Court of California
Feb 19, 1909
100 P. 254 (Cal. 1909)
Case details for

Noble v. Cleland

Case Details

Full title:NOBLE v. CLELAND, Treasurer.

Court:Supreme Court of California

Date published: Feb 19, 1909

Citations

100 P. 254 (Cal. 1909)

Citing Cases

People v. Mueller

In Alabama, Michigan, Mississippi, Missouri, Montana, Oregon, and Texas, the decisions are that although the…