From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Noble v. Ackerman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jun 20, 1995
216 A.D.2d 140 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)

Summary

In Noble v Ackerman (216 AD2d 140 [1st Dept 1995]), the First Department denied defendant's request for authorizations regarding a knee operation performed ten years before the accident because the "plaintiff does not claim that his knee was injured in the accident or that his prior knee injury was aggravated (cf. Caplow v Otis El. Co., 176 AD2d 199, 200)."

Summary of this case from Brennan v. Dormitory Authority of State of N.Y.

Opinion

June 20, 1995

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Bronx County (Barry Salman, J.).


Defendant's request for medical authorizations pertaining to a knee operation performed on plaintiff more than ten years before the accident in issue was properly denied on the ground that plaintiff does not claim that his knee was injured in the accident or that his prior knee injury was aggravated ( cf., Caplow v. Otis El. Co., 176 A.D.2d 199, 200).

Concur — Sullivan, J.P., Rosenberger, Ellerin, Rubin and Mazzarelli, JJ.


Summaries of

Noble v. Ackerman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jun 20, 1995
216 A.D.2d 140 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)

In Noble v Ackerman (216 AD2d 140 [1st Dept 1995]), the First Department denied defendant's request for authorizations regarding a knee operation performed ten years before the accident because the "plaintiff does not claim that his knee was injured in the accident or that his prior knee injury was aggravated (cf. Caplow v Otis El. Co., 176 AD2d 199, 200)."

Summary of this case from Brennan v. Dormitory Authority of State of N.Y.
Case details for

Noble v. Ackerman

Case Details

Full title:CARMELO NOBLE et al., Respondents, v. CALVIN ACKERMAN, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Jun 20, 1995

Citations

216 A.D.2d 140 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
629 N.Y.S.2d 198

Citing Cases

Hayes v. Costco Wholesale Corp.

Defendant states that the authorizations seek the information necessary to discern the allocation of…

Rohan v. Turner Constr. Co.

MOTION SEQ. NOs. 010 and 011 Upon the foregoing papers, it is hereby ORDERED that so much of motion sequences…