From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

N.L.R.B. v. Kostrencich

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nov 13, 1961
296 F.2d 561 (9th Cir. 1961)

Opinion

No. 17242.

November 13, 1961.

Stuart Rothman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Frederick U. Reel, and Warren M. Davison, Attys. for N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner.

No brief filed on behalf of respondents.

Margolis McTernan, Los Angeles, Cal., for intervenor.

Before STEPHENS, CHAMBERS and HAMLIN, Circuit Judges.


On balance, it is not believed by this Court that enforcement of the Labor Board's order would promote either industrial peace or the collective bargaining process which are purposes of the National Labor Relations Act, 29 U.S.C.A. § 151 et seq. Therefore enforcement is declined.

The board's remedy, because of a condition in a prior contract which seems not to have been enforced, would now deprive the employees of any representation for a period. This seems undesirable and punitive without any compensating incidents.


Summaries of

N.L.R.B. v. Kostrencich

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nov 13, 1961
296 F.2d 561 (9th Cir. 1961)
Case details for

N.L.R.B. v. Kostrencich

Case Details

Full title:NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner, v. Orfeo KOSTRENCICH, et al.…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Nov 13, 1961

Citations

296 F.2d 561 (9th Cir. 1961)

Citing Cases

N.L.R.B. v. Metalab-Labcraft, Div. of Metalab

The sole issue is whether the remedy fashioned by the Board will, under the particular circumstances here,…