From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

NLRB v. CINCINNATI L. 271, LITH PHOTO. INT'L

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit
Apr 16, 1974
495 F.2d 763 (6th Cir. 1974)

Opinion

No. 73-1922.

Argued April 4, 1974.

Decided April 16, 1974.

Peter G. Nash, Gen. Counsel, John S. Irving, Deputy Gen. Counsel, Patrick Hardin, Associate Gen. Counsel, Elliott Moore, Deputy Associate Gen. Counsel, John H. Ferguson, Richard A. Cohen, Attys., National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., on brief, for petitioner.

Harold S. Freeman, Gregory L. Hellrung, Cincinnati, Ohio, on brief, for intervenor, The United States Playing Card Co.; Dinsmore, Shohl, Coates Deupree, Cincinnati, Ohio, of counsel.

Eugene Cotton, Russell Woody, Chicago, Ill., on brief, for respondents; Cotton, Watt, Jones, King Bowlus, Chicago, Ill., of counsel.

Petition for enforcement of an order of the National Labor Relations Board.

Before CELEBREZZE, McCREE and ENGEL, Circuit Judges.


ORDER

This cause came on to be heard on the record and the briefs and arguments of counsel. Upon due consideration thereof, the court is of the opinion that while it might have been better to defer the issues therein to arbitration, the Board's failure to do so does not amount to an abuse of discretion, and it further appearing to the court that the decision and order of the Board, reported at 204 NLRB No. 65, are supported by substantial evidence on the record as a whole, now therefore

It is ordered that the order of the Board be and it is hereby enforced.


Summaries of

NLRB v. CINCINNATI L. 271, LITH PHOTO. INT'L

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit
Apr 16, 1974
495 F.2d 763 (6th Cir. 1974)
Case details for

NLRB v. CINCINNATI L. 271, LITH PHOTO. INT'L

Case Details

Full title:NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, PETITIONER, THE UNITED STATES PLAYING CARD…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit

Date published: Apr 16, 1974

Citations

495 F.2d 763 (6th Cir. 1974)