From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Njuguna v. Smith

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS
Nov 28, 2016
Civil Action No. 16-cv-12075-ADB (D. Mass. Nov. 28, 2016)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 16-cv-12075-ADB

11-28-2016

PETER ROBERT MWAURA NJUGUNA, Petitioner, v. YOLANDA SMITH, Superintendent of the Suffolk County House of Correction, Respondent.


ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO DISMISS FOR MOOTNESS

Petitioner filed his petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241 on October 17, 2016. [ECF No. 1]. At that time, Petitioner, a foreign national from Kenya, was an immigration detainee in Immigration and Customs Enforcement ("ICE") custody at the Suffolk County House of Corrections. His petition sought his immediate release from ICE custody on the basis that his confinement exceeded the presumptively reasonable six-month time period under Zadvydas v. Davis, 533 U.S. 678, 701 (2001), and therefore violated 8 U.S.C. § 1231(a)(6) and due process. Now before the court is Respondent's motion to dismiss for mootness. [ECF No. 6.] Respondent submitted an affidavit in support of the motion from Michael Homsy, an Acting Assistant Field Office Director at the Burlington, Massachusetts, United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement office. [ECF No. 7-1]. The affidavit states that Petitioner was released on October 27, 2016, and is no longer in ICE custody. Id.

"It is black-letter law that, in a federal court, justiciability requires the existence of an actual case or controversy. U.S. Const. art. III, § 2, cl. 1. Even if an actual case or controversy exists at the inception of litigation, a case may be rendered moot (and, therefore, subject to dismissal) if changed circumstances eliminate any possibility of effectual relief." Maine Sch. Admin. Dist. No. 35 v. Mr. R., 321 F.3d 9, 17 (1st Cir. 2003). "A habeas petition will become moot once the prisoner is released from custody unless the petitioner can show some sufficient collateral consequence of the underlying proceeding." Leitao v. Reno, 311 F.3d 453, 455 (1st Cir. 2002). Here, Petitioner challenges only the length of his detention, and he has since been released. Thus, the case is moot. See Omondiagbe v. McDonald, No. CIV.A. 13-11182-MBB, 2014 WL 1413560, at *1 (D. Mass. Apr. 10, 2014) (where petitioner was released from custody and removed from the United States after filing his petition, petition was moot).

Accordingly, the motion to dismiss for mootness [ECF No. 6] is GRANTED, and the case is dismissed.

SO ORDERED. November 28, 2016

/s/ Allison D. Burroughs

ALLISON D. BURROUGHS

U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Njuguna v. Smith

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS
Nov 28, 2016
Civil Action No. 16-cv-12075-ADB (D. Mass. Nov. 28, 2016)
Case details for

Njuguna v. Smith

Case Details

Full title:PETER ROBERT MWAURA NJUGUNA, Petitioner, v. YOLANDA SMITH, Superintendent…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

Date published: Nov 28, 2016

Citations

Civil Action No. 16-cv-12075-ADB (D. Mass. Nov. 28, 2016)

Citing Cases

Ahmed v. Moniz

unless the petitioner can show some sufficient collateral consequence of the underlying proceeding.” Njuguna…