In re P.V.

Full title: NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY…

Court: SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION

Date published: May 16, 2017

DOCKET NO. A-1962-15T4 (App. Div. May. 16, 2017)

Opinion

DOCKET NO. A-1962-15T4

05-16-2017

NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. V.V., Defendant-Appellant. IN THE MATTER OF P.V. and A.V., minors.

Joseph E. Krakora, Public Defender, attorney for appellant (Dana Citron, Designated Counsel, on the briefs). Christopher S. Porrino, Attorney General, attorney for respondent (Andrea M. Silkowitz, Assistant Attorney General, of counsel; Mehnaz Rahim, Deputy Attorney General, on the brief). Joseph E. Krakora, Public Defender, Law Guardian, attorney for minors (Daniel Ruiz, Designated Counsel, on the brief).

PER CURIAM

RECORD IMPOUNDED

NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION

This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although it is posted on the internet, this opinion is binding only on the parties in the case and its use in other cases is limited. R.1:36-3. Before Judges Lihotz, Hoffman and O'Connor. On appeal from Superior Court of New Jersey, Chancery Division, Family Part, Bergen County, Docket No. FN-02-108-15. Joseph E. Krakora, Public Defender, attorney for appellant (Dana Citron, Designated Counsel, on the briefs). Christopher S. Porrino, Attorney General, attorney for respondent (Andrea M. Silkowitz, Assistant Attorney General, of counsel; Mehnaz Rahim, Deputy Attorney General, on the brief). Joseph E. Krakora, Public Defender, Law Guardian, attorney for minors (Daniel Ruiz, Designated Counsel, on the brief). PER CURIAM

Defendant V.V. appeals from (1) a January 21, 2015 order incorporating her admission to child neglect, resulting from her alcohol abuse, which exposed her two children to a substantial risk of harm; and (2) a November 20, 2015 order denying her motion to vacate her stipulation. The court has been informed appellant has passed away. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed as moot. Greenfield v. N.J. Dept. of Corr., 382 N.J. Super. 254, 257-58 (App. Div. 2006).

Dismissed. I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true copy of the original on file in my office.

CLERK OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION