Opinion
Argued February 19, 1929 —
Decided May 20, 1929.
On appeal from the Supreme Court, whose opinion is reported in 105 N.J.L. 94.
For the appellant, Frankland Briggs and Wall, Haight, Carey Hartpence.
For the respondent, Edward L. Katzenbach.
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Black in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — THE CHANCELLOR, CHIEF JUSTICE, PARKER, KALISCH, LLOYD, CASE, McGLENNON, KAYS, HETFIELD, DEAR, JJ. 10.
For reversal — None.