From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Nival v. Sutton

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Jun 19, 2012
Civil Action No. 11-cv-01695-DME-MEH (D. Colo. Jun. 19, 2012)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 11-cv-01695-DME-MEH

06-19-2012

PEDRO NIVAL, Plaintiff, v. DR. JERE SUTTON, CCCF HMO Provider, JUDY BREZENDINE, CCCF Clinical Services Director, LYNN THOMPSON, CCCF Nurse Practitioner, JANE DOE #1 (SANDY), JANE DOE #2 (MARY), and JANE DOE #3 (CHRISTIE), NURSING STAFF, all in their official and individual capacities, Defendants.


MINUTE ORDER

Entered by Michael E. Hegarty , United States Magistrate Judge, on June 19, 2012.

Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Amend Complaint [filed June 15 2012; docket #77] is denied without prejudice, as Plaintiff has not provided the Court with a copy of the proposed amended complaint. If Plaintiff wishes to renew his request, he must include with his motion copy of the proposed amended complaint so that the Court may determine whether justice so requires leave to amend. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a).

With respect to Plaintiff's "two-fold question" regarding the appropriate litigation strategy, the Court reminds Plaintiff that it will not provide legal advice to any party, pro se or otherwise.


Summaries of

Nival v. Sutton

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Jun 19, 2012
Civil Action No. 11-cv-01695-DME-MEH (D. Colo. Jun. 19, 2012)
Case details for

Nival v. Sutton

Case Details

Full title:PEDRO NIVAL, Plaintiff, v. DR. JERE SUTTON, CCCF HMO Provider, JUDY…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Date published: Jun 19, 2012

Citations

Civil Action No. 11-cv-01695-DME-MEH (D. Colo. Jun. 19, 2012)