From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Nival v. Sutton

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Apr 27, 2012
Civil Action No. 11-cv-01695-DME-MEH (D. Colo. Apr. 27, 2012)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 11-cv-01695-DME-MEH

04-27-2012

PEDRO NIVAL, Plaintiff, v. DR. JERE SUTTON, CCCF HMO Provider, JUDY BREZENDINE, CCCF Clinical Services Director, LYNN THOMPSON, CCCF Nurse Practitioner, JANE DOE #1 (SANDY), JANE DOE #2 (MARY), and JANE DOE #3 (CHRISTIE), NURSING STAFF, all in their official and individual capacities, Defendants.


MINUTE ORDER

Entered by Michael E. Hegarty , United States Magistrate Judge, on April 27, 2012.

Plaintiff's Motion for Preliminary Injunction [filed April 24, 2012; docket #55] is denied without prejudice for failure to comply with Fed. R. Civ. P. 5(a)(1)(D) and D.C. Colo. LCivR 5.1G. Rule 5(a)(1)(D) requires that a written motion filed with the Court must be served on every party. Local Rule 5.1G requires, in pertinent part, that "[e]ach paper, other than one filed ex parte, shall be accompanied by a certificate of service indicating the date it was served, the name and address of the person to whom it was sent, and the manner of service." Plaintiff's motion contains a certificate of mailing indicating that the motion was mailed to the Clerk of the Court. Plaintiff is obligated to provide service to all parties; simply mailing a document to the Court does not meet this requirement.


Summaries of

Nival v. Sutton

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Apr 27, 2012
Civil Action No. 11-cv-01695-DME-MEH (D. Colo. Apr. 27, 2012)
Case details for

Nival v. Sutton

Case Details

Full title:PEDRO NIVAL, Plaintiff, v. DR. JERE SUTTON, CCCF HMO Provider, JUDY…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Date published: Apr 27, 2012

Citations

Civil Action No. 11-cv-01695-DME-MEH (D. Colo. Apr. 27, 2012)