From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Nitto v. Kalisiak

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jan 29, 1985
107 A.D.2d 1066 (N.Y. App. Div. 1985)

Opinion

January 29, 1985

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Erie County, Mintz, J.

Present — Hancock, Jr., J.P., Callahan, Doerr, Denman and O'Donnell, JJ.


Order unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, motion granted and complaint dismissed. Memorandum: Defendant's motion to dismiss after plaintiff's eight-month delay in serving the complaint should have been granted (CPLR 3012, subd [b]). In an attempt to establish the merit of the claim, plaintiff's counsel states by way of affidavit that, on information and belief, defendant was operating her vehicle at an improvident rate of speed. We have stated repeatedly that an affidavit of merit must be based on firsthand knowledge and that an attorney's affidavit based on information and belief is insufficient ( Wurzburger v Smith Fuel Co., 101 A.D.2d 620; Luksic v. Killmer, 100 A.D.2d 864).


Summaries of

Nitto v. Kalisiak

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jan 29, 1985
107 A.D.2d 1066 (N.Y. App. Div. 1985)
Case details for

Nitto v. Kalisiak

Case Details

Full title:DANIEL V. NITTO, Individually and as Administrator of the Estate of TERESA…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Jan 29, 1985

Citations

107 A.D.2d 1066 (N.Y. App. Div. 1985)

Citing Cases

Rasmussen v. Niagara Mohawk Power Corp.

To be relieved of their default, plaintiffs were required to demonstrate, inter alia, the existence of a…

Imperiale v. Prezioso

Here, however, plaintiffs rely exclusively upon the complaint verified by counsel, which is unsatisfactory…