From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Niswonger v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION FIVE.
Feb 6, 2018
545 S.W.3d 879 (Mo. Ct. App. 2018)

Opinion

No. ED 105151

02-06-2018

Aaron NISWONGER, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

Matthew J. Bell, 1010 Market Street, Suite 1100, St. Louis, MO 63101, for appellant. Joshua D. Hawley, Atty. Gen., Daniel N. McPherson, Asst. Atty. Gen., P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO 65102, for respondent.


Matthew J. Bell, 1010 Market Street, Suite 1100, St. Louis, MO 63101, for appellant.

Joshua D. Hawley, Atty. Gen., Daniel N. McPherson, Asst. Atty. Gen., P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO 65102, for respondent.

Before James M. Dowd, C.J., Lawrence E. Mooney, J., and Stanley J. Wallach, Sp.J.

ORDER

PER CURIAM

Aaron Niswonger appeals the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief. The motion court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law are not clearly erroneous. An opinion would have no precedential value. We have furnished the parties with a memorandum, for their information only, setting forth the reasons for our order. We affirm. Rule 84.16(b)(2)&(5).


Summaries of

Niswonger v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION FIVE.
Feb 6, 2018
545 S.W.3d 879 (Mo. Ct. App. 2018)
Case details for

Niswonger v. State

Case Details

Full title:Aaron NISWONGER, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION FIVE.

Date published: Feb 6, 2018

Citations

545 S.W.3d 879 (Mo. Ct. App. 2018)