From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Nisbett v. L-Nutra Longevity Ctrs, Inc.

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Nov 2, 2021
21-CV-6290 (RA) (S.D.N.Y. Nov. 2, 2021)

Opinion

21-CV-6290 (RA)

11-02-2021

KAREEM NISBETT, Plaintiff, v. L-NUTRA LONGEVITY CENTERS, INC., d/b/a PROLON, Defendant.


ORDER

RONNIE ABRAMS, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE:

It has been reported to the Court that this case has been settled in principle and that the parties are in the process of finalizing a settlement agreement. Accordingly, it is hereby:

ORDERED that the above-captioned action is discontinued without costs to any party and without prejudice to restoring the action to this Court's docket if the application to restore the action is made within thirty (30) days. Any application to reopen this action must be filed within thirty (30) days of this order, and any application filed thereafter may be denied solely on that basis. If the parties seek to have the Court retain jurisdiction to enforce a settlement agreement, the terms of the agreement must be placed on the public record and “so ordered” by the Court within the same thirty-day period. See Hendrickson v. United States, 791 F.3d 354, 358 (2d Cir. 2015).

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Nisbett v. L-Nutra Longevity Ctrs, Inc.

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Nov 2, 2021
21-CV-6290 (RA) (S.D.N.Y. Nov. 2, 2021)
Case details for

Nisbett v. L-Nutra Longevity Ctrs, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:KAREEM NISBETT, Plaintiff, v. L-NUTRA LONGEVITY CENTERS, INC., d/b/a…

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Nov 2, 2021

Citations

21-CV-6290 (RA) (S.D.N.Y. Nov. 2, 2021)