From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Nisbett v. Hardscoop, Inc.

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Nov 9, 2021
1:21-cv-6501-MKV (S.D.N.Y. Nov. 9, 2021)

Opinion

1:21-cv-6501-MKV

11-09-2021

KAREEM NISBETT, Plaintiff, v. HARDSCOOP, INC., Defendant.


ORDER OF DISMISSAL

MARY KAY VYSKOCIL, United States District Judge:

The Court is in receipt of a letter filed by Plaintiff informing the Court that the parties have reached a settlement in principle [ECF No. 11]. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the above-captioned action is discontinued without costs to any party and without prejudice to restoring the action to this Court's calendar if the parties are unable to memorialize their settlement in writing and as long as the application to restore the action is made by December 10, 2021. If no such application is made by that date, today's dismissal of the action is with prejudice. See Muze, Inc. v. Digital On Demand, Inc., 356 F.3d 492, 494 n.1 (2d Cir. 2004). ECF Nos. 8 and 10 are denied without prejudice as moot.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Nisbett v. Hardscoop, Inc.

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Nov 9, 2021
1:21-cv-6501-MKV (S.D.N.Y. Nov. 9, 2021)
Case details for

Nisbett v. Hardscoop, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:KAREEM NISBETT, Plaintiff, v. HARDSCOOP, INC., Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Nov 9, 2021

Citations

1:21-cv-6501-MKV (S.D.N.Y. Nov. 9, 2021)