Opinion
No. C 12-05706 WHA
03-19-2013
SNEH NIRANJAN, Plaintiff, v. BANK OF AMERICA, N.A.; RECONTRUST COMPANY; DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST COMPANY, AS TRUSTEE FOR THE CERTIFICATE HOLDERS OF HARBORVIEW MORTGAGE LOAN TRUST 2004-11, ASSETBACKED PASS-THROUGH CERTIFICATES, SERIES 2004-11 INDIVIDUALLY; MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION SYSTEMS, INC.; and DOES 1 through 100 inclusive, Defendants.
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE
On January 24, 2013, defendants filed a motion to dismiss. Pursuant to Local Rule 7-3, plaintiff's opposition or statement of non-opposition thereto was due by February 7. None was received. After the action was reassigned to the undersigned judge on February 22, defendants renoticed their motion for hearing on April 4. As no response from plaintiff had yet been filed, an order issued setting a briefing schedule and requiring plaintiff's opposition or statement of non-opposition to be filed by March 13. None was received.
Plaintiff, who is represented by counsel, has twice failed to respond to defendants' motion to dismiss. Because plaintiff has failed to respond to court deadlines governing this case, plaintiff is ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE why the action should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). If plaintiff fails to file a written response to this order by NOON ON THURSDAY, MARCH 21, 2013, defendants’ motion to dismiss may be granted or the action may be dismissed for failure to prosecute. The hearing scheduled for April 4 shall remain on calendar.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
______________
WILLIAM ALSUP
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE