From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Nippon Shinyaku Co. v. Iancu

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Mar 10, 2020
2019-1824 (Fed. Cir. Mar. 10, 2020)

Opinion

2019-1824

03-10-2020

NIPPON SHINYAKU CO., LTD., Plaintiff-Appellant v. ANDREI IANCU, UNDER SECRETARY OF COMMERCE FOR INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY AND DIRECTOR OF THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE, Defendant-Appellee

ANTHONY F. LO CICERO, Amster Rothstein & Ebenstein LLP, New York, NY, argued for plaintiff-appellant. Also represented by MARION P. METELSKI, HOLLY PEKOWSKY. BRIAN RACILLA, Office of the Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA, argued for defendant-appellee. Also represented by KAKOLI CAPRIHAN, THOMAS W. KRAUSE.


NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia in No. 1:10-cv-01142-EGS, United States District Judge Emmet G. Sullivan.

JUDGMENT

ANTHONY F. LO CICERO, Amster Rothstein & Ebenstein LLP, New York, NY, argued for plaintiff-appellant. Also represented by MARION P. METELSKI, HOLLY PEKOWSKY. BRIAN RACILLA, Office of the Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA, argued for defendant-appellee. Also represented by KAKOLI CAPRIHAN, THOMAS W. KRAUSE. THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (PROST, Chief Judge, LINN and TARANTO, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

March 10, 2020

Date

/s/ Peter R. Marksteiner

Peter R. Marksteiner

Clerk of Court


Summaries of

Nippon Shinyaku Co. v. Iancu

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Mar 10, 2020
2019-1824 (Fed. Cir. Mar. 10, 2020)
Case details for

Nippon Shinyaku Co. v. Iancu

Case Details

Full title:NIPPON SHINYAKU CO., LTD., Plaintiff-Appellant v. ANDREI IANCU, UNDER…

Court:United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Date published: Mar 10, 2020

Citations

2019-1824 (Fed. Cir. Mar. 10, 2020)