From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Nin v. United States

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION
Oct 14, 2011
No.: C11-1138-PSG (N.D. Cal. Oct. 14, 2011)

Opinion

No.: C11-1138-PSG

10-14-2011

DAVID NIN, JOE NIN, ANA NIN and LINDA HOPKINS, Individually and as Successors-In-Interest to the Estate of JOSE NIN, Plaintiffs, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendants.

KATHRYN A. STEBNER (SB #121088) KARMAN RATLIFF (SB #267631) STEBNER AND ASSOCIATES CRAIG NEEDHAM (SB #52010) K1RSTEN FISH (SB #217940) NEEDHAM, KEPNER & FISH, LLP Attorneys for Plaintiffs


KATHRYN A. STEBNER (SB #121088)

KARMAN RATLIFF (SB #267631)

STEBNER AND ASSOCIATES

CRAIG NEEDHAM (SB #52010)

K1RSTEN FISH (SB #217940)

NEEDHAM, KEPNER & FISH, LLP

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

STIPULATION EXTENDING FACT DISCOVERY CUTOFF FOR LIMITED

PURPOSE OF PLAINTIFF DAVID NIN'S DEPOSITION

Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 6-2, the parties to this action HEREBY STIPULATE AND REQUEST that the Court make the following modification to the trial and pretrial schedule for this case. This request is made due in part to the travel schedule of plaintiff David Nin, which is likely to impair the ability of the parties to complete Mr. Nin's deposition by the current deadline.

+----------------------------------------------------------+ ¦Event ¦Current Date ¦Proposed Date* ¦ +----------------------+-----------------+-----------------¦ ¦Fact Discovery Cutoff:¦November 30, 2011¦December 16, 2011¦ +----------------------------------------------------------+

The fact discovery cutoff is extended for purposes of Plaintiff David Nin's deposition only, and the parties further stipulate that the disclosed experts will have two weeks from the date that the deposition transcript is delivered to counsel to supplement their reports regarding David Nin's testimony.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

STEBNER AND ASSOCIATES

KATHRYN STEBNER

KARMAN RATLIFF

Attorneys for Plaintiff

MELINDA HAAG

United States Attorney

CLAIRE T. CORMIER

Assistant United States Attorney

(PROPOSED) ORDER

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

PAUL S. GREWAL

United States Magistrate


Summaries of

Nin v. United States

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION
Oct 14, 2011
No.: C11-1138-PSG (N.D. Cal. Oct. 14, 2011)
Case details for

Nin v. United States

Case Details

Full title:DAVID NIN, JOE NIN, ANA NIN and LINDA HOPKINS, Individually and as…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION

Date published: Oct 14, 2011

Citations

No.: C11-1138-PSG (N.D. Cal. Oct. 14, 2011)