From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Nimry v. Berryhill

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
May 31, 2017
CASE NO. 17CV0956 GPC RBB (S.D. Cal. May. 31, 2017)

Opinion

CASE NO. 17CV0956 GPC RBB

05-31-2017

HALA NIMRY, Plaintiff, v. NANCY A. BERRYHILL, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant.


ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS

[Dkt. No. 2]

Background

Plaintiff, Hala Nimry, with counsel, has filed a complaint requesting judicial review of the Commissioner's decision denying Plaintiff's claims for disability insurance benefits and supplemental security income under Title II & XVI of the Social Security Act. Dkt. No. 1. Plaintiff did not prepay the civil filing fee required by 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a) at the time of the filing, but instead filed a Motion to Proceed in Forma Pauperis ("IFP") pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915. For the following reasons, the Court GRANTS Plaintiff's motion to proceed IFP.

/ / / /

Discussion

All parties instituting any civil action, suit, or proceeding in a district court of the United States, except an application for writ of habeas corpus, must pay a filing fee of $400. See 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a). An action may proceed despite a plaintiff's failure to prepay the entire fee only if he is granted leave to proceed IFP pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a). See Andrews v. Cervantes, 493 F.3d 1047, 1051 (9th Cir. 2007); Rodriguez v. Cook, 169 F.3d 1176, 1177 (9th Cir. 1999). A court may authorize the commencement of a suit without prepayment of fees if the plaintiff submits an affidavit, including a statement of all of his or her assets, showing that he or she is unable to pay the fees. See 28 U.S.C. §1915(a). Such an affidavit must include a complete statement of the plaintiff's assets. See id.

Here, Plaintiff submitted a declaration reporting that she is not presently employed and that she has not worked since 2013. Dkt. No. 2 at 2. She receives public assistance, retirement income, and other monetary contributions from family for a total monthly income of $3,220. Id. at 1-2. Plaintiff adds she has $4.00 in her checking account, she owns a car worth around $1,500.00, and she does not own any real estate. Id. at 2-3. Plaintiff's monthly expenses, which include rent, utilities, food, transportation and motor vehicle insurance, amount to approximately $2,775. Id. at 4-5. Because Plaintiff lacks substantial assets and because her expenses nearly equal her total monthly income, she has sufficiently demonstrated that she is unable to pay the required filing fee and that she meets the requirements to proceed IFP.

Conclusion

Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis is GRANTED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: May 31, 2017

/s/_________

Hon. Gonzalo P. Curiel

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Nimry v. Berryhill

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
May 31, 2017
CASE NO. 17CV0956 GPC RBB (S.D. Cal. May. 31, 2017)
Case details for

Nimry v. Berryhill

Case Details

Full title:HALA NIMRY, Plaintiff, v. NANCY A. BERRYHILL, Acting Commissioner of…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: May 31, 2017

Citations

CASE NO. 17CV0956 GPC RBB (S.D. Cal. May. 31, 2017)