From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Nimkoff Rosenfeld Schechter v. O'Flaherty

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Mar 18, 2010
71 A.D.3d 533 (N.Y. App. Div. 2010)

Opinion

No. 2392.

March 18, 2010.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Richard F. Braun, J.), entered July 23, 2009, which denied defendants' motion to dismiss the complaint, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

Phillips Nizer LLP, New York (Donald L. Kreindler of counsel), for appellants.

Nimkoff Rosenfeld Schechter, LLP, New York (Jenni Spiritis of counsel), for respondent.

Before: Mazzarelli, J.P., Saxe, Nardelli, Abdus-Salaam and Román, JJ.


Plaintiffs failure to plead at the outset that the dispute over counsel fees and disbursements was not covered by the Fee Dispute Resolution Program ( see 22 NYCRR 136.1 [b] [2], [6]) is not a jurisdictional defect precluding it from serving an amended complaint ( see Kerner Kerner v Dunham, 46 AD3d 372). Therefore, plaintiff had the right to amend its complaint during the pendency of defendants' motion to dismiss (CPLR 3025 [a]; see Johnson v Spence, 286 AD2d 481, 483). It is well settled that an amended complaint supersedes the original complaint, thus rendering without legal effect the defective earlier pleading ( see Chalasani v Neuman, 64 NY2d 879; Elegante Leasing, Ltd. v Cross Trans Svc, Inc., 11 AD3d 650).


Summaries of

Nimkoff Rosenfeld Schechter v. O'Flaherty

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Mar 18, 2010
71 A.D.3d 533 (N.Y. App. Div. 2010)
Case details for

Nimkoff Rosenfeld Schechter v. O'Flaherty

Case Details

Full title:NIMKOFF ROSENFELD SCHECHTER, LLP, Formerly Known as SCHECHTER NIMKOFF…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Mar 18, 2010

Citations

71 A.D.3d 533 (N.Y. App. Div. 2010)
2010 N.Y. Slip Op. 2067
895 N.Y.S.2d 824

Citing Cases

Singe v. Bates Troy, Inc.

Plaintiff was not required to seek leave of the court for an amendment because, by our count, plaintiff…

MJK Bldg. Corp. v. Fayland Realty Inc.

In opposition to the motion, plaintiffs submit, among other things, an affidavit of Albert MJ Kim, owner of…