From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Nikolis v. Reznick

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 17, 1995
214 A.D.2d 658 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)

Opinion

April 17, 1995

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Richmond County (Cusick, J.).


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

The weight of the evidence establishes that on June 14, 1983, after having implicitly, and falsely, represented themselves to be the owners of the property known as 421 Jefferson Avenue, in Staten Island, Max Reznick and Elsie Reznick signed a contract to convey that property to Vasilios Nikolis and Kaliroe Nikolis. The evidence also establishes that Mr. Reznick accepted $18,500 from Mr. Nikolis as a down payment, and deposited it in his personal money market account. After unsuccessfully seeking to complete the contract, Mr. and Mrs. Nikolis commenced the present action for specific performance and damages. In the judgment appealed from, the court awarded the plaintiffs the principal sum of $18,500, which represents their original down payment, plus interest in the sum of $15,399, calculated from August 15, 1984, the last scheduled closing date. The sole issue on the present appeal concerns the propriety of the award of interest.

Under the circumstances of this case, we see no error in the court's award of pre-decision interest (see, CPLR 5001 [a], [b]). The plaintiffs were at the very least entitled to a return of their down payment, without the need to make a formal demand, in accordance with paragraph 20 of the parties' contract. That paragraph is silent as to the calculation of interest. The terms of CPLR 5001 (b) authorize the court to direct that interest be calculated at least from when the appellants' time to perform their part of the parties' bargain, which had been extended to August 15, 1984, finally expired (see, e.g., Partrick v Guarniere, 204 A.D.2d 702; Ansonia Realty Co. v Ansonia Assocs., 142 A.D.2d 514).

We have examined the appellants' remaining contentions and find them to be without merit. Bracken, J.P., Pizzuto, Hart and Krausman, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Nikolis v. Reznick

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 17, 1995
214 A.D.2d 658 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
Case details for

Nikolis v. Reznick

Case Details

Full title:VASILIOS NIKOLIS, Respondent, v. BRUCE REZNICK et al., Appellants, et al.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Apr 17, 1995

Citations

214 A.D.2d 658 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
625 N.Y.S.2d 580

Citing Cases

S&S Management, LLC v. Berk

The defendants established their prima facie entitlement to judgment as a matter of law by tendering…

Schramm v. Mei Chu Solow

In opposition, the seller failed to raise a triable issue of fact ( cf. Gorgoglione v. Gillenson, 47 A.D.3d…