From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Nightingale v. Superior Court

Supreme Court of California
Dec 28, 1920
184 Cal. 583 (Cal. 1920)

Opinion

S. F. No. 9682.

December 28, 1920.

APPLICATION for a Writ of Certiorari to review an order modifying an order concerning counsel fees in an action for divorce. Denied.

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

A.P. Black for Petitioner.


We entertain no doubt of the power of the court in divorce actions to modify its orders for the payment to the wife of money necessary to enable her to support herself during the pendency of the action, or to enable her to prosecute or defend the action, as the circumstances with regard to necessity change. As to orders for the payment of money for support there has never been any question in this behalf, and there is no difference in principle with relation to money to be paid to her for the purpose of enabling her to pay attorneys. The superior court did not exceed its jurisdiction in this matter.

The application for a writ of certiorari is denied.

Angellotti, C. J., Lennon, J., Wilbur, J., Sloane, J., Lawlor, J., and Olney, J., concurred.


Summaries of

Nightingale v. Superior Court

Supreme Court of California
Dec 28, 1920
184 Cal. 583 (Cal. 1920)
Case details for

Nightingale v. Superior Court

Case Details

Full title:GLADYS NIGHTINGALE, Petitioner, v. SUPERIOR COURT OF THE CITY AND COUNTY…

Court:Supreme Court of California

Date published: Dec 28, 1920

Citations

184 Cal. 583 (Cal. 1920)
194 P. 1002

Citing Cases

Warner v. Warner

"We entertain no doubt of the power of the court in divorce actions to modify its orders for the payment to…

Glesby v. Glesby

However, in Grande v. Donovan, supra, the statement is made (p. 695) that "The time for filing a notice of…