From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Nightingale v. J.H. C.K. Eagle, Incorporated

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jun 4, 1912
99 N.E. 1111 (N.Y. 1912)

Opinion

Argued May 24, 1912

Decided June 4, 1912

Morgan J. O'Brien and William P. Niebrugge for appellant.

John C. Tomlinson and Millard F. Tompkins for respondent.


Judgment reversed and new trial granted, costs to abide event, on dissenting opinion of INGRAHAM, P.J., below.

Concur: CULLEN, Ch. J., GRAY, WILLARD BARTLETT, HISCOCK, CHASE and COLLIN, JJ. Absent: VANN, J.


Summaries of

Nightingale v. J.H. C.K. Eagle, Incorporated

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jun 4, 1912
99 N.E. 1111 (N.Y. 1912)
Case details for

Nightingale v. J.H. C.K. Eagle, Incorporated

Case Details

Full title:WILLIAM NIGHTINGALE, Respondent, v . J.H. C.K. EAGLE, INCORPORATED…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Jun 4, 1912

Citations

99 N.E. 1111 (N.Y. 1912)
99 N.E. 1111

Citing Cases

Rodin v. Universal Button Co.

ents constituted the written contract between the parties, a complete and clear contract which more than…

Bowen v. Merdinger

6. The cases upon which defendants rely are either distinguishable or inapplicable to the situation here…