From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Nieves-Ford v. Gordon

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jul 15, 2008
53 A.D.3d 581 (N.Y. App. Div. 2008)

Opinion

No. 2007-10850.

July 15, 2008.

In a child support proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 4, the father appeals from an order of the Family Court, Nassau County (Marks, J.), dated October 9, 2007, which, inter alia, denied his application for leave to file a motion, in effect, to resettle an order of the same court (Bannon, S.M.) dated December 1, 2005.

Roslyn Nieves, named herein as Roslyn Nieves-Ford, Elmont, N.Y., respondent pro se.

Before: Mastro, J.P., Spolzino, Ritter and Leventhal, JJ.


Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The Family Court enjoined the father from filing any further motions, without court approval, based on his abuse of the judicial process ( see Matter of Simpson v Ptaszynska, 41 AD3d 607; Matter of Pignataro v Davis, 8 AD3d 487). Here, the Family Court properly denied the father's later application for leave to file a motion, in effect, to resettle an order of the same court dated December 1, 2005.


Summaries of

Nieves-Ford v. Gordon

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jul 15, 2008
53 A.D.3d 581 (N.Y. App. Div. 2008)
Case details for

Nieves-Ford v. Gordon

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of ROSLYN NIEVES-FORD, Respondent, v. MICHAEL GORDON…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jul 15, 2008

Citations

53 A.D.3d 581 (N.Y. App. Div. 2008)
2008 N.Y. Slip Op. 6299
860 N.Y.S.2d 403

Citing Cases

Breytman v. Olinville Realty

ar for a deposition, since the defendant demonstrated that the deposition was reasonably calculated to result…

Bitton v. H.S.B.C.

Civil Court previously barred plaintiff from filing any further motions, without written court approval,…