From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Niemi v. State

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT
Aug 28, 2020
325 So. 3d 932 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2020)

Opinion

Case No. 5D20-598

08-28-2020

Michael NIEMI, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

Michael Niemi, Crestview, Pro se. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Allison Leigh Morris, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Respondent.


Michael Niemi, Crestview, Pro se.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Allison Leigh Morris, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

Michael Niemi petitions this Court seeking a new appeal, raising two claims of ineffective assistance of his appellate counsel. We find no merit to the claims raised by Niemi and deny his petition. We write only to note the order revoking Niemi's sex offender probation mistakenly lists the curfew violation found by the court to be a violation of condition 14 when it was actually a violation of condition 29. We direct the trial court to amend this scrivener's error in the order of revocation.

PETITION DENIED.

EVANDER, C.J., HARRIS and TRAVER, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Niemi v. State

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT
Aug 28, 2020
325 So. 3d 932 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2020)
Case details for

Niemi v. State

Case Details

Full title:MICHAEL NIEMI, Petitioner, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent.

Court:DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT

Date published: Aug 28, 2020

Citations

325 So. 3d 932 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2020)