From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Niemi v. Burgess

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Oct 19, 2012
Civil Action No. 12-cv-00869-RBJ (D. Colo. Oct. 19, 2012)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 12-cv-00869-RBJ

10-19-2012

JOHN NIEMI, ROBERT NAEGELE, III, and JESPERPARNEVIK, Plaintiffs, v. MICHAEL FRANK BURGESS, ERWIN LASSHOFER, INNOVATIS GMBH, INNOVATIS IMMOBILIEN GMBH, INNOVATIS ASSET MANAGEMENT SA, LEXINGTON CAPITAL & PROPERTY INVESTMENTS, LLC, BARRY FUNT, and CREDIT SUISSE, AG, Defendant.


JUDGE R. BROOKE JACKSON


STIPULATION AND ORDER REGARDING CUSTODY OF

EXHIBITS AND DEPOSITIONS

It is stipulated that upon the conclusion of the trial, counsel for the parties shall retain custody of their respective exhibits and depositions until such time as all need for the exhibits and depositions has terminated and the time to appeal has expired or all appellate proceedings have been terminated plus sixty (60) days.

DATED at Denver, Colorado this 19th day of October, 2012.

BY THE COURT:

______________________

R. Brooke Jackson, U.S. District Judge

______________________

Counsel for Plaintiff

______________________

Counsel for Defendant

______________________


Summaries of

Niemi v. Burgess

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Oct 19, 2012
Civil Action No. 12-cv-00869-RBJ (D. Colo. Oct. 19, 2012)
Case details for

Niemi v. Burgess

Case Details

Full title:JOHN NIEMI, ROBERT NAEGELE, III, and JESPERPARNEVIK, Plaintiffs, v…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Date published: Oct 19, 2012

Citations

Civil Action No. 12-cv-00869-RBJ (D. Colo. Oct. 19, 2012)