Nieman v. Smithkline Beecham Corp.

Full title: MIKAYLA NIEMAN, et al v. SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION d/b/a…

Court: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Date published: Dec 12, 2011

CIVIL ACTION NO. 11-4458 (E.D. Pa. Dec. 12, 2011)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 11-4458

December 12, 2011.

ORDER

TIMOTHY J. SAVAGE, J.

AND NOW, this 12th day of December, 2011, upon consideration of the Plaintiff’s Motion to Remand (Document No. 7), the defendant’s response, and after oral argument, it is ORDERED that the motion is GRANTED, and this matter is REMANDED, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1447(c), to the state court from which it was removed.