From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Nielsen v. Graber

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
May 1, 2012
CV-11-344-TUC-JGZ (D. Ariz. May. 1, 2012)

Opinion

CV-11-344-TUC-JGZ

05-01-2012

Doug Nielsen, Petitioner, v. Warden Conrad M. Graber, Respondent.


ORDER

Pending before the Court is a Report and Recommendation issued by United States Magistrate Judge Bernardo P. Velasco that recommends denying Petitioner's habeas petition filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §2241. As throughly explained by Magistrate Judge Velasco, Petitioner is not entitled to relief as his claim that he was deprived of due process at his disciplinary hearing is without merit and fails to provide a basis for relief. As Petitioner's objections do not undermine the analysis and proper conclusion reached by Magistrate Judge Velasco, Petitioner's objections are rejected and the Report and Recommendation is adopted.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED as follows:

1. The Report and Recommendation (Doc. 14) is accepted and adopted;

2. Petitioner's §2241 habeas petition is denied and this case is dismissed with prejudice;

3. The Clerk of the Court shall enter judgment accordingly and close the file in this matter.

______________________

Jennifer G. Zipps

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Nielsen v. Graber

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
May 1, 2012
CV-11-344-TUC-JGZ (D. Ariz. May. 1, 2012)
Case details for

Nielsen v. Graber

Case Details

Full title:Doug Nielsen, Petitioner, v. Warden Conrad M. Graber, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Date published: May 1, 2012

Citations

CV-11-344-TUC-JGZ (D. Ariz. May. 1, 2012)