From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Niego v. Braun

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Feb 21, 1995
212 A.D.2d 445 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)

Opinion

February 21, 1995

Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (William Davis, J.).


As alleged in the complaint and conceded by defendant in his answer and counterclaims, a contractual relationship was established between the parties and there exists a dispute over monies transferred from plaintiff to defendant in connection with that relationship. Thus, the motion court properly found that defendant's prima facie tort counterclaim cannot stand because both the complaint and answering papers establish that plaintiff's sole motive in bringing this action was not "`disinterested malevolence'" (Burns Jackson Miller Summit Spitzer v. Lindner, 59 N.Y.2d 314, 333).

Concur — Wallach, J.P., Rubin, Ross, Asch and Mazzarelli, JJ.


Summaries of

Niego v. Braun

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Feb 21, 1995
212 A.D.2d 445 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
Case details for

Niego v. Braun

Case Details

Full title:DORON NIEGO, Respondent, v. SEYMOUR BRAUN, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Feb 21, 1995

Citations

212 A.D.2d 445 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
623 N.Y.S.2d 109

Citing Cases

International Shared Serv. v. Cty. of Nassau

The fifth cause of action was properly dismissed as against the County of Nassau and NCMC on the grounds of…

Fada Industries, Inc. v. Falchi Building Co.

To succeed on a claim for prima facie tort under New York law, a plaintiff must allege "disinterested…