From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Niebla v. Timothy

United States District Court, N.D. Florida, Panama City Division
Jun 2, 2008
CASE NO.: 5:08cv148-SPM/AK (N.D. Fla. Jun. 2, 2008)

Opinion

CASE NO.: 5:08cv148-SPM/AK.

June 2, 2008


ORDER


This cause comes before the Court for consideration of the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (doc. 3) dated June 9, 2008. Plaintiff has been furnished a copy and filed objections (doc. 4). Pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1), I have determined that the report and recommendation should be adopted despite Plaintiff's objections.

Plaintiff has not paid the filing fee or sought to proceed in forma pauperis. Since he has filed 3 or more other cases that have been dismissed as frivolous, malicious, or for failure to state a claim, Plaintiff must pay the filing fee before he can proceed. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). His allegations are too vague to show that he is in imminent danger of serious physical injury to qualify for the exception.

Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED as follows:

1. The magistrate judge's report and recommendation (doc. 3) is ADOPTED and incorporated by reference in this order.

2. This case is dismissed without prejudice to Plaintiff's opportunity to refile with full payment of the $350 filing fee.

DONE AND ORDERED.


Summaries of

Niebla v. Timothy

United States District Court, N.D. Florida, Panama City Division
Jun 2, 2008
CASE NO.: 5:08cv148-SPM/AK (N.D. Fla. Jun. 2, 2008)
Case details for

Niebla v. Timothy

Case Details

Full title:JORGE L. NIEBLA, Plaintiff, v. U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE ELIZABETH M. TIMOTHY…

Court:United States District Court, N.D. Florida, Panama City Division

Date published: Jun 2, 2008

Citations

CASE NO.: 5:08cv148-SPM/AK (N.D. Fla. Jun. 2, 2008)