Niebla v. Ombudsman

Full title: JORGE L. NIEBLA, Plaintiff, v. OMBUDSMAN, et al., Defendants

Court: United States District Court, N.D. Florida, Pensacola Division

Date published: Apr 23, 2008

Case No.: 3:08cv29/RV/EMT (N.D. Fla. Apr. 23, 2008)

Opinion

Case No.: 3:08cv29/RV/EMT.

April 23, 2008

ORDER

ROGER VINSON, District Judge

This cause comes on for consideration upon the magistrate judge's report and recommendation dated March 20, 2008. Plaintiff has been furnished a copy of the report and recommendation and has been afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). I have made a de novo determination of all timely filed objections.

Having considered the report and recommendation, and any timely filed objections thereto timely filed, I have determined that the report and recommendation should be adopted.

Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:

1. The magistrate judge's report and recommendation is adopted and incorporated by reference in this order.

2. This case is DISMISSED without prejudice for Plaintiff's failure to comply with an order of the court.

3. All pending motions are DENIED as moot.

DONE AND ORDERED.