Niebla v. Nelson

Full title: JORGE L. NIEBLA, Plaintiff, v. BILL NELSON Defendant

Court: United States District Court, N.D. Florida, Panama City Division

Date published: Sep 29, 2008

Case No.: 5:08cv160/RS/EMT (N.D. Fla. Sep. 29, 2008)

Opinion

Case No.: 5:08cv160/RS/EMT.

September 29, 2008

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

ELIZABETH TIMOTHY, Magistrate Judge

This cause is before the court upon referral from the clerk. Plaintiff commenced this action by filing a civil rights complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Doc. 1). On May 21, 2008, this court entered an order giving Plaintiff thirty (30) days in which to pay the filing fee or file a complete application to proceed in forma pauperis (Doc. 4). Plaintiff failed to respond to the order; therefore, on July 15, 2008, the court issued an order requiring Plaintiff to show cause, within twenty (20) days, why this action should not be dismissed for failure to comply with an order of the court (Doc. 7). The time for compliance with the show cause order has now elapsed, and Plaintiff has not paid the filing fee or filed a complete application to proceed in forma pauperis.

Accordingly, it is respectfully RECOMMENDED:

That this case be DISMISSED without prejudice for Plaintiff's failure to comply with an order of the court.

NOTICE TO THE PARTIES

Any objections to these proposed findings and recommendations must be filed within ten days after being served a copy thereof. Any different deadline that may appear on the electronic docket is for the court's internal use only . A copy of objections shall be served upon all other parties. Failure to object may limit the scope of appellate review of factual findings. See 28 U.S.C. § 636; United States v. Roberts , 858 F.2d 698, 701 (11th Cir. 1988).