From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Nidoy v. Immigration Naturalization Service

United States District Court, W.D. Washington, at Seattle
Jan 31, 2003
CASE NO. C02-2405Z (W.D. Wash. Jan. 31, 2003)

Opinion

CASE NO. C02-2405Z

January 31, 2003


ORDER DISMISSING PETITIONER'S MOTION FOR TRO AND RE-NOTING RESPONDENTS' MOTION TO DISMISS


On November 27, 2002, petitioner filed, through counsel, a habeas corpus petition pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241, challenging a final order of removal by the Immigration and Naturalization Service ("INS") to the Philippines. (Dkt. #1). Petitioner also filed an application and proposed order for a temporary restraining order, along with a memorandum in support of such relief. (Dkt. #3).

On December 5, 2002, the Court ordered respondents to file a Return and Status Report ("RSR") within thirty days of the date of the Order. (Dkt. #4). In addition, the Court ordered respondents to file an answer to petitioner's motion for a TRO no later than December 16, 2002. (Dkt. #4 at 2). On December 13, 2002, the parties lodged a stipulated order extending the briefing schedule. (Dkt. #5). Within the stipulation, the parties agreed that respondents would not remove petitioner to the Philippines while these proceedings are pending. (Dkt. #5 at 2). The stipulation also asked the Court to consolidate petitioner's motion and habeas petition for consideration on January 31, 2003. (Dkt. #5 at 2). On December 17, 2002, the Court issued the Order.

On January 13, 2003, respondents filed their RSR, along with a motion to dismiss. (Dkt. #6). Petitioner has not yet filed a reply. On January 23, 2003, respondents filed a supplement to their motion to dismiss. and re-noted the motion for consideration on February 7, 2003. (Dkt. #8). Based upon a preliminary review of the record, it is hereby ORDERED:

(1) Petitioner's motion for a TRO (Dkt. #3) is DISMISSED AS MOOT. As already stipulated in the parties Joint Stipulation and Proposed Order Extending Briefing schedule (Dkt. #5), petitioner's removal to the Philippines is STAYED during the pendency of these proceedings.

(2) The Clerk shall RE-NOTE respondents' motion to dismiss for consideration on February 7, 2003.

(3) The Clerk shall send a copy of this Order to all counsel of record, and shall forward a copy of this Order to the Honorable Thomas S. Zilly.


Summaries of

Nidoy v. Immigration Naturalization Service

United States District Court, W.D. Washington, at Seattle
Jan 31, 2003
CASE NO. C02-2405Z (W.D. Wash. Jan. 31, 2003)
Case details for

Nidoy v. Immigration Naturalization Service

Case Details

Full title:MARVIN NIDOY, Petitioner v. IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, et…

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Washington, at Seattle

Date published: Jan 31, 2003

Citations

CASE NO. C02-2405Z (W.D. Wash. Jan. 31, 2003)