From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Nidec Corporation v. Victor Co. of Japan, Ltd.

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, N.D. California, Oakland Division
Jan 29, 2007
C05 00686 SBA (EMC) (N.D. Cal. Jan. 29, 2007)

Opinion

          MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP, FRANKLIN BROCKWAY GOWDY, THOMAS D. KOHLER.

          DAVID C. BOHRER, MICHAEL J. LYONS,

          DION M. BREGMAN, Attorneys for Plaintiff and Counter-Defendant,

          NIDEC CORPORATION and Additional, Defendants NIDEC AMERICA,

          CORPORATION and NIDEC SINGAPORE, HOWARD RICK NEMEROVSKI CANADY, FALK & RABKIN,

          MARTIN R. GLICK, SBN 40187, BOBBIE J. WILSON SBN 148317.

          AMSTER, ROTHSTEIN & EBENSTEIN LLP, MORTON AMSTER (pro hac vice).

          ANTHONY F. LO CICERO (pro hac vice), CHARLES R. MACEDO (pro hac vice).

          HOWARD WIZENFELD ( pro hac vice ), Anthony F. Lo Cicero, Attorneys for Defendants and Counter-Plaintiffs.

          VICTOR COMPANY OF JAPAN, LTD. and JVC COMPONENTS (THAILAND) CO., LTD, and Defendants AGILIS INC., and AGILIS, TECHNOLOGY INC., ANTHONY F. LO CICERO, MARTIN R. GLICK (No. 40187), BOBBIE J. WILSON (No. 148317), HOWARD RICE NEMEROVSKI CANADY, FALK & RABKIN, A Professional Corporation, San Francisco, California, MORTON AMSTER (pro hac vice), ANTHONY F. LO CICERO (pro hac vice), CHARLES R. MACEDO (pro hac vice), HOWARD WIZENFELD (pro hac vice), AMSTER, ROTHSTEIN & EBENSTEIN, LLP, New York, New York, Attorneys for Defendants and Counter-Plaintiffs.

          VICTOR COMPANY OF JAPAN, LTD. and JVC, COMPONENTS (THAILAND) CO., LTD., and Defendants, AGILIS INC. and AGILIS TECHNOLOGY INC.


         

         STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONCERNING BRIEFING SCHEDULE & HEARING FOR NIDEC'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO AMEND NIDEC CORPORATION'S FINAL INFRINGEMENT CONTENTIONS (D.I. 503) C05 00686 SBA (EMC)

          EDWARD M. CHEN, Magistrate Judge.

         Further to the parties' meet-and-confer teleconference on January 26, 2007, and pursuant to Civil L.R. 6-3 of the Local Rules of Practice in Civil Proceedings before the United States District Court for the Northern District of California, the parties stipulate to an order providing the following:

         1. The hearing date for Nidec's Motion for Leave to Amend Nidec Corporation's Final Infringement Contentions ("Motion for Leave") (D.I. 503) is set for February 14, 2007, at 10:30 a.m., or as soon thereafter as possible.

         2. JVC's opposition to the Motion for Leave is due on or before February 2, 2007.

         3. Nidec's reply in further support of the Motion for Leave is due on or before February 7, 2007.

         4. Upon entry of this stipulation and order, Nidec's Motion to Shorten Time on the Motion for Leave (D.I. 502) is moot.

         IT IS SO AGREED AND STIPULATED.

         PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

         Pursuant to General Order No. 45, Section X(B) regarding signatures, I, Anthony F. Lo Cicero, attest that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from each of the other signatories. I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed this 26th day of January 2007, at New York, New York.


Summaries of

Nidec Corporation v. Victor Co. of Japan, Ltd.

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, N.D. California, Oakland Division
Jan 29, 2007
C05 00686 SBA (EMC) (N.D. Cal. Jan. 29, 2007)
Case details for

Nidec Corporation v. Victor Co. of Japan, Ltd.

Case Details

Full title:NIDEC CORPORATION Plaintiff, v. VICTOR COMPANY OF JAPAN, LTD., JVC…

Court:United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, N.D. California, Oakland Division

Date published: Jan 29, 2007

Citations

C05 00686 SBA (EMC) (N.D. Cal. Jan. 29, 2007)