From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Nicosia v. Shultis

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 5, 1997
239 A.D.2d 473 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)

Opinion

May 5, 1997

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Dutchess County (Bernhard, J.),


Ordered that the appeal from the order is dismissed, as no appeal lies from an order denying reargument; and it is further,

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed insofar as appealed from; and it is further,

Ordered that the defendants are awarded one bill of costs.

As the party seeking a declaratory judgment, the plaintiff bears the burden of demonstrating his entitlement thereto ( see, Herold v. East Coast Scaffolding, 208 A.D.2d 592; Graham v Beermunder, 93 A.D.2d 254). The plaintiff has not met this burden.

As a member of a volunteer fire department, the plaintiff may be permitted to display a blue flashing light on his personal automobile when responding to emergency calls ( see, Vehicle and Traffic Law § 375[4]; 15 NYCRR 44.4[a], [c]). He has no statutory right, however, to unilaterally declare, as a matter of law, that his personal automobile is an appropriately equipped "emergency ambulance service vehicle" as defined by vehicle and Traffic Law § 115-c, and hence an "authorized emergency vehicle" as defined by vehicle and Traffic Law § 101. Therefore, his vehicle is not statutorily authorized, pursuant to vehicle and Traffic Law § 375(41)(2), to display a red flashing light or siren when he uses it to respond to emergencies as a member of the East Fishkill Rescue Squad ( see, People v Hesselink, 76 Misc.2d 418). The plaintiff has also failed to sustain his argument that the defendants were preempted from promulgating a regulation inconsistent with the rights conferred upon him by the Vehicle and Traffic Law since there is no authority which precludes the defendants from prohibiting the use of red lights by volunteer emergency medical technicians. Therefore, in accordance with the provisions of his membership application, the plaintiff must obey the regulation enacted by the defendants restricting the use of red lights and sirens to authorized chief officers.

The plaintiff's remaining contentions are without merit.

Miller, J.P., Copertino, Sullivan and Krausman, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Nicosia v. Shultis

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 5, 1997
239 A.D.2d 473 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
Case details for

Nicosia v. Shultis

Case Details

Full title:WILLIAM J. NICOSIA, Appellant, v. ROBERT SHULTIS, JR., as Chairman of the…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: May 5, 1997

Citations

239 A.D.2d 473 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
658 N.Y.S.2d 640

Citing Cases

Nicosia v. Shultis

Decided October 28, 1997 Reported below, 239 A.D.2d 473. Motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal from so…

Dutkanych v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.

USF G also contends that it is not obligated to defend or indemnify Andrew because his use of the Gould…