From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Nicklau v. Peoples State Bank

Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Oct 14, 1969
459 P.2d 853 (Okla. 1969)

Opinion

No. 43399.

October 14, 1969.

Appeal from the District Court of Tulsa County; Phillips Breckinridge, Trial Judge.

Appeal dismissed.

Charles C. Dunn, Tulsa, for plaintiff in error.

Rosenstein, Livingston, Fist Ringold, by Coleman Robinson, Tulsa, for defendant in error.


Motion to dismiss supported by affidavit, alleging the appeal in effect has been abandoned by plaintiff in error because of unexcused failure to designate the record pursuant to Rule 10 has been filed.

Response to motion to dismiss required under General Rule 9 (12 O.S. 1961 following § 986 [ 12-986] p. 868, 869) was not made. Plaintiff in error was directed to show cause by a time certain why this appeal should not be dismissed as abandoned. No response has been filed.

Unexcused failure by plaintiff in error to timely designate the record on appeal pursuant to the provisions of Rule 10, Rules for Civil Appeals, 40 OBJ 1, p. 17, January 11, 1969, constitutes an abandonment of the appeal and appeal is subject to dismissal under such circumstances.

The appeal is accordingly dismissed.

All the Justices concur.


Summaries of

Nicklau v. Peoples State Bank

Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Oct 14, 1969
459 P.2d 853 (Okla. 1969)
Case details for

Nicklau v. Peoples State Bank

Case Details

Full title:PETE G. NICKLAU, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR, v. PEOPLES STATE BANK, DEFENDANT IN…

Court:Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Date published: Oct 14, 1969

Citations

459 P.2d 853 (Okla. 1969)
1969 OK 156

Citing Cases

Haynes v. Barnett

Unexcused failure by a plaintiff in error to timely designate the record on appeal pursuant to applicable…

Harmony Dependent Sch. Dist #106 v. Carrier

Unexcused failure by plaintiff in error to timely designate the record on appeal pursuant to the applicable…