From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Nicklas v. Giordano

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jul 10, 2014
NO. CV 12-2918-VAP (AS) (C.D. Cal. Jul. 10, 2014)

Opinion

NO. CV 12-2918-VAP (AS)

07-10-2014

STEVE NICKLAS, Plaintiff, v. CORRECTIONS OFFICER GIORDANO, Defendants.


ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS,


CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF


UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. section 636, the Court has reviewed the Complaint, all of the records herein, and the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge. The time for filing Objections to the Report and Recommendation has passed and no Objections have been received. Accordingly, the Court accepts the findings, conclusions and recommendations of the Magistrate Judge.

IT IS ORDERED that Judgment shall be entered dismissing this action without prejudice.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk serve copies of this Order and the Judgment herein on Plaintiff at his current address of record.

LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.

__________

VIRGINIA A. PHILLIPS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Nicklas v. Giordano

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jul 10, 2014
NO. CV 12-2918-VAP (AS) (C.D. Cal. Jul. 10, 2014)
Case details for

Nicklas v. Giordano

Case Details

Full title:STEVE NICKLAS, Plaintiff, v. CORRECTIONS OFFICER GIORDANO, Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Jul 10, 2014

Citations

NO. CV 12-2918-VAP (AS) (C.D. Cal. Jul. 10, 2014)

Citing Cases

Son v. Kibler

To the extent Bryant seeks to act as legal counsel for Petitioner, the Court notes “pro se prisoner litigants…