From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Nickelson v. Budnik

United States District Court, Eastern District of Arkansas
Jul 8, 2024
2:23-cv-00110-LPR (E.D. Ark. Jul. 8, 2024)

Opinion

2:23-cv-00110-LPR

07-08-2024

KENDALL C. NICKELSON ADC #150640 PLAINTIFF v. CHRISTOPHER BUDNIK, et al. DEFENDANTS


ORDER

LEE P. RUDOFSKY UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE.

The Court has reviewed the Recommended Disposition (RD) submitted by United States Magistrate Judge Patricia S. Harris (Doc. 54). No objections have been filed, and the time for doing so has expired. After a de novo review of the RD, along with careful consideration of the entire case record, the Court hereby approves and adopts the RD in its entirety as this Court's findings and conclusions in all respects.

Accordingly, Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 41) is GRANTED. Plaintiff's claims are DISMISSED without prejudice based on his failure to fully exhaust his administrative remedies. The Clerk is instructed to close this case. The Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that an in forma pauperis appeal from this Order or the accompanying Judgment would not be taken in good faith.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Nickelson v. Budnik

United States District Court, Eastern District of Arkansas
Jul 8, 2024
2:23-cv-00110-LPR (E.D. Ark. Jul. 8, 2024)
Case details for

Nickelson v. Budnik

Case Details

Full title:KENDALL C. NICKELSON ADC #150640 PLAINTIFF v. CHRISTOPHER BUDNIK, et al…

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of Arkansas

Date published: Jul 8, 2024

Citations

2:23-cv-00110-LPR (E.D. Ark. Jul. 8, 2024)