From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Nicholson v. Salt Lake City Corporation

United States District Court, D. Utah, Central Division
May 6, 2003
Case No. 2:02-CV-1179 PGC (D. Utah May. 6, 2003)

Opinion

Case No. 2:02-CV-1179 PGC

May 6, 2003


ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO QUASH


On December 16, 2002, defendants Shanelle Boyd, James Spangenberg, and Zane Swim (hereinafter "Movants"), filed a special appearance challenging the propriety of service in this matter and filing a motion to quash summonses. No response has been received to that motion. Therefore, the court GRANTS the motion to quash the summons to the Movants.

If the plaintiff intends to properly serve the Movants, he is directed to do so within 21 days and proceed promptly to a rule 16 scheduling conference following answers from the Moveants. If plaintiff does not intend to serve the Movants, he is directed to proceed promptly with arranging a rule 16 scheduling conference with defendant Salt Lake City Corporation.

The court grants the motion to quash (#4-1).


Summaries of

Nicholson v. Salt Lake City Corporation

United States District Court, D. Utah, Central Division
May 6, 2003
Case No. 2:02-CV-1179 PGC (D. Utah May. 6, 2003)
Case details for

Nicholson v. Salt Lake City Corporation

Case Details

Full title:DAVID ROSS NICHOLSON, Plaintiff, vs. SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION, (Salt…

Court:United States District Court, D. Utah, Central Division

Date published: May 6, 2003

Citations

Case No. 2:02-CV-1179 PGC (D. Utah May. 6, 2003)