From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Nicholson v. Salem Area Transit and Saif

Oregon Court of Appeals
May 10, 1994
866 P.2d 525 (Or. Ct. App. 1994)

Opinion

91-03460; CA A76237

Argued and submitted September 24, 1993.

Affirmed January 26, 1994. Petition for review allowed May 10, 1994 ( 319 Or. 80). See later issue Oregon Reports.

Judicial Review from Workers' Compensation Board.

Karen M. Werner argued the cause for petitioner. With her on the brief was Emmons, Kropp, Kryger, Alexander, Egan Allen.

Steve Cotton, Special Assistant Attorney General, argued the cause for respondents. With him on the brief were Theodore R. Kulongoski, Attorney General, and Virginia L. Linder, Solicitor General.

Before Rossman, Presiding Judge, and De Muniz and Leeson, Judges.


PER CURIAM

Affirmed.


Claimant seeks review of an order of the Workers' Compensation Board holding that it does not have jurisdiction to review an order of the Director under ORS 656.245(1)(b) concerning the appropriateness of palliative care. We have disposed of most of the issues that claimant raises in Hathaway v. Health Future Enterprises, 125 Or. App. 549, 865 P.2d 503 (1993). Claimant contends that the Board's ruling that claimant has no right to a hearing on palliative care disputes violates the United States and Oregon constitutions. The issue is raised for the first time on review, and we will not address it.

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Nicholson v. Salem Area Transit and Saif

Oregon Court of Appeals
May 10, 1994
866 P.2d 525 (Or. Ct. App. 1994)
Case details for

Nicholson v. Salem Area Transit and Saif

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Compensation of Rexi L. Nicholson, Claimant. Rexi L…

Court:Oregon Court of Appeals

Date published: May 10, 1994

Citations

866 P.2d 525 (Or. Ct. App. 1994)
866 P.2d 525

Citing Cases

Samayoa v. Greenwood Inn

Claimant seeks review of an order of the Workers' Compensation Board holding that it does not have…

Nicholson v. Salem Area Transit

Therefore, according to the court, under the last sentence of ORS 656.704 (3), the Board had no jurisdiction…