From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

NICHOLSON v. ELI LILLY AND COMPANY

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Dec 7, 1973
285 So. 2d 648 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1973)

Opinion

No. 73-293.

October 30, 1973. Rehearing Denied December 7, 1973.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Dade County, Thomas A. Testa, J.

Levenstein, Burke Associates, P.A., Miami, for appellant.

Smathers Thompson and James L. Armstrong, III, West, Goldman Weisberg; Stephens, Magill, Thornton Sevier, Miami, and Timothy Carl Blake, for appellees.

Before BARKDULL, C.J., and PEARSON and HAVERFIELD, JJ.


Appellant's cause was dismissed with prejudice for lack of prosecution. The record supports a finding by the trial court that the cause was not only subject to dismissal under Rule 1.420(e), 30 F.S.A., but, under the special circumstances presented, was also subject to dismissal with prejudice pursuant to the inherent power of the trial court to eliminate causes from its docket which are not being prosecuted with due diligence. See Rule 1.420(e); Reddish v. Forlines, Fla.App. 1968, 207 So.2d 703.

Affirmed.


Summaries of

NICHOLSON v. ELI LILLY AND COMPANY

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Dec 7, 1973
285 So. 2d 648 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1973)
Case details for

NICHOLSON v. ELI LILLY AND COMPANY

Case Details

Full title:ANN NICHOLSON, APPELLANT, v. ELI LILLY AND COMPANY, AN INDIANA…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Dec 7, 1973

Citations

285 So. 2d 648 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1973)

Citing Cases

Hahn v. First Nat. Bank of Delray

This, obviously, is not such a case. Judicial statements giving wider range to the trial court's discretion…

Pan Am. Bk. of Dade v. Continental

PER CURIAM. Affirmed. State v. Williams, 222 So.2d 477 (Fla. 3rd D.C.A. 1969); Curry Corporation v.…